Search for: "Hodges v. Social Security Administration"
Results 1 - 20
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2018, 7:21 am
Hodges [opinion, PDF], in which the Court declared state bans on same-sex marriage unconstitutional, the court ruled in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 7:28 am
The two main programs of the Social Security Administration (SSA) are Title II and Title XVI. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 7:53 am
” The Justice Department told attorneys for a pair of plaintiffs that the Social Security Administration “would apply the Supreme Court’s June ruling declaring that marriage is a constitutional right, Obergefell v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 8:38 am
According to a recent news article from the International Business Times, a same-couple is now entitled to spousal benefits for a spouse receiving Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI), as long as they meet the required criteria under Social Security Administration (SSA) regulations. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 8:08 am
Even so, we need not lose sleep about same-sex marriage equality leading to the Social Security Administration having to recognize all 78 of Warren Jeffs’ [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 3:22 am
The appellants argued specific statutory rights are not to be cut down by subordinate legislation passed under the vires of a different Act, a rule identified in the case of R v Secretary of State for Social Security, Ex p Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants [1997] 1 WLR 275 (“JCWI”). [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:25 pm
Hodges. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 9:00 am
In Denise Hodges V Prudential Insurance Company of America & Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey (Horizon), the plaintiff Denise Hodges alleged that Prudential had contravened the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) by failing to pay disability benefits to her. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:30 pm
Hodges, which struck down laws banning same-sex marriage. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am
(See paragraph 28, referring to Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom v Department of Health and Social Security [1981] AC 800 (HL)). [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 2:02 pm
Before the Supreme Court, the Obama administration took a firm position and relied heavily on two Cold-War-era decisions that immigration law professors love to hate: Knauff v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 6:38 pm
Bob Jones University v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 7:45 am
Hodges [LKenneth Mehlman Brief]. 6. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 12:51 pm
Those with civil unions who have not moved forward with full marriages still cannot receive federal marriage benefits, including those related to taxes or Social Security. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 12:51 pm
Those with civil unions who have not moved forward with full marriages still cannot receive federal marriage benefits, including those related to taxes or Social Security. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
Hodges, he excoriated at length the Lochner decision itself, its activist embrace of “courts . . . substitut[ing] their social and economic beliefs for the judgment of legislative bodies . . . [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm
Data Security Management in Digital Business, Oana Buzianu, Independent. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
Beyer’s article Estate Planning Ramifications of Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:50 am
More broadly, income subject to substantial information reporting requirements includes pensions, annuities, interest income, dividend income, unemployment compensation, and taxable Social Security benefits. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
On 17 and 18 October 2023, the UK Supreme Court (Lords Hodge, Hamblen, Leggatt, Burrows and Richards) heard the appeal in the case of George v Cannell. [read post]
